Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 11:06
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Just in the last 5 years:
Bank of Japan leaves interest rate unadjusted at 0.5% as expected - FXStreet
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Is it okay for my husband to help other ladies without telling me?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
This Common Herb May Hold the Key to Fighting Alzheimer’s, According to a New Study - Food & Wine
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
The Day the Earth Smiled: Earth, the Moon, and Saturn All in One Frame - The Daily Galaxy
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Pacers’ Tyrese Haliburton stuns Thunder in last second to open NBA Finals - The Washington Post
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.